ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2023
Factors Associated with Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteria Isolated from Respiratory Samples.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of ESAC-Net/EARS-Net Data from 29 EEA Countries for Spatiotemporal Associations Between Antimicrobial Use and Resistance-Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-producingAIMS microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Although extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are a global threat, as they may cause respiratory infection, the factors associated with the isolation of these bacteria from sputum remain unclear. We therefore explored the factors related to ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolated from sputum samples. Methods This study included consecutive patients admitted to our department from 2010 to 2021 with K. pneumoniae or E. coli isolated from their sputum. The patients were categorized into ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing groups, and the factors associated with ESBL-producing bacteria isolation were assessed using a binomial logistic regression analysis. Results We included 82 patients, and ESBL-producing pathogens were isolated from 23 (28%). The usage rates of cephem [odds ratio (OR) 4.000, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.402-11.409, p=0.010], quinolone (OR 2.961, 95% CI 1.097-7.996, p=0.032), and macrolide (OR 4.273, 95% CI 1.518-12.028, p=0.006) in the past year were significantly higher in the ESBL-producing group than in the non-ESBL-producing group. The multivariate analysis revealed that the applications of cephem (adjusted OR: 4.130, 95% CI: 1.233-13.830, p=0.021) and macrolide (adjusted OR: 6.365, 95% CI: 1.922-21.077, p=0.002) was independently associated with the isolation of ESBL-producing bacteria. Conclusion A history of cephem and macrolide use can be considered a risk factor for ESBL-producing bacteria isolation from sputum samples. Physicians need to consider these risk factors when determining antibiotics for the treatment of patients with respiratory infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.