Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476468›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Psychiatric consultation in general practitioners' daily practice: a qualitative study on the experience of consultation-liaison psychiatry interventions in primary care settings in French-speaking Switzerland.

Konstantinos Tzartzas, Pierre-Nicolas Oberhauser, Régis Marion-Veyron, Stéphane Saillant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Climate change and mental health: Position paper of the European Psychiatric Association.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantinos TzartzasDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Rue du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. konstantinos.tzartzas@unisante.ch.
Pierre-Nicolas OberhauserFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Régis Marion-VeyronDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Rue du Bugnon 44, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphane SaillantNeuchâtel Psychiatry Centre, Rue de la Maladière 45, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental disorders are frequent in primary care settings, which is challenging for primary care physicians. In Neuchâtel (Switzerland), a Consultation-Liaison psychiatrist integrated three primary care group practices, proposing both clinical interventions and supervisions/psychiatric training. Primary care physicians' experience regarding this collaboration was investigated.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted. Three focus groups were organized in each primary care group practice involved in the project (10 primary care physicians participated in focus groups). Data were analysed with thematic content analysis.

resultsSix major themes emerged from our analysis, describing primary care physicians' collaboration with psychiatrists: 1) Impact on a difficult to reach and "reluctant to consult" population; 2) Fluidity of the intraprofessional collaboration; 3) Influence on the doctor-patient relationship; 4) Positive emotional experiences; 5) Psychiatric counselling and training; 6) Long-term prospects for the project.

conclusionsConsultation-Liaison psychiatrist's presence came as a relief for participating primary care physicians, facilitating accessibility to mental healthcare, introducing a common culture of care, and offering "in-situ" psychiatric training. Primary care physicians felt that their relationships with patients benefited from such interventions, being better able to deal with complex emotional experiences and found patients more confident regarding proposed care. Models of psychiatric intervention provided in primary care must establish settings of collaboration that reinforce relationships between primary care physicians, psychiatrists, and patients.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalGeneral PractitionersHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAmbulatory care facilitiesConsultation-liaison psychiatryGeneral practitionersMental healthPrimary health careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36476468
PMCPMC9730556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.