Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476416›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

A robust pipeline for efficient knock-in of point mutations and epitope tags in zebrafish using fluorescent PCR based screening.

Blake Carrington, Ramanagouda Ramanagoudr-Bhojappa, Erica Bresciani, Tae-Un Han, Raman Sood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CRISPR-based functional genomics tools in vertebrate models.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Engineering precision zebrafish alleles of human disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Presynaptic Nrxn3 is essential for ribbon-synapse assembly in hair cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Blake CarringtonTranslational and Functional Genomics Branch, Zebrafish Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Ramanagouda Ramanagoudr-BhojappaCancer Genetics Unit, Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Erica BrescianiOncogenesis and Development Section, Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Tae-Un HanMolecular Neurogenetics Section, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Raman SoodTranslational and Functional Genomics Branch, Zebrafish Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. rsood@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5565-662X
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

NHGRI/DIR Zebrafish CoreZICHG200351 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SOOD, RAMAN · 2015 to 2025
$12.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC HG200351NHGRI NIH HHS ZIC HG200351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 has become a powerful tool in zebrafish to generate targeted gene knockouts models. However, its use for targeted knock-in remains challenging due to inefficient homology directed repair (HDR) pathway in zebrafish, highlighting the need for efficient and cost-effective screening methods. 

resultsHere, we present our fluorescent PCR and capillary electrophoresis based screening approach for knock-in using a single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide donor (ssODN) as a repair template for the targeted insertion of epitope tags, or single nucleotide changes to recapitulate pathogenic human alleles. For the insertion of epitope tags, we took advantage of the expected change in size of the PCR product. For point mutations, we combined fluorescent PCR with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis to distinguish the fish with the knock-in allele. As a proof-of-principle, we present our data on the generation of fish lines with insertion of a FLAG tag at the tcnba locus, an HA tag at the gata2b locus, and a point mutation observed in Gaucher disease patients in the gba gene. Despite the low number of germline transmitting founders (1-5%), combining our screening methods with prioritization of founder fish by fin biopsies allowed us to establish stable knock-in lines by screening 12 or less fish per gene.

conclusionsWe have established a robust pipeline for the generation of zebrafish models with precise integration of small DNA sequences and point mutations at the desired sites in the genome. Our screening method is very efficient and easy to implement as it is PCR-based and only requires access to a capillary sequencer.

Indexed as

Point MutationZebrafishAnimalsEpitopesHumansResearchEpitopesCRISPR/Cas9Epitope tagsKnock-inPoint mutationsssODNZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36476416
PMCPMC9730659
OpenAlexW4311585242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.