Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476387›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

The NAD

Arnau Llobet Rosell, Maria Paglione, Jonathan Gilley, Magdalena Kocia, Giulia Perillo, Massimiliano Gasparrini, Lucia Cialabrini, Nadia Raffaelli, Carlo Angeletti, Giuseppe Orsomando and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial NMNAT3 reduces amyloid aggregates inMitochondrial communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. A metabolic cell death program downstream of SARM1 couples NADProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. NADAntioxidants & redox signaling · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Arnau Llobet RosellDepartment of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7728-2999
Maria PaglioneDepartment of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0921-940X
Jonathan GilleyJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9510-7956
Magdalena KociaDepartment of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7805-1970
Giulia PerilloDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Massimiliano GasparriniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Lucia CialabriniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Nadia RaffaelliDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Carlo AngelettiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Section of Biochemistry, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Giuseppe OrsomandoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Section of Biochemistry, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6640-097X
Pei-Hsuan WuDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-0744
Michael P ColemanJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andrea LoretoJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6535-6436
Lukas Jakob NeukommDepartment of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5007-3959
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S009582/1aWellcome Trust 201535Wellcome Trust 210904/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axon degeneration contributes to the disruption of neuronal circuit function in diseased and injured nervous systems. Severed axons degenerate following the activation of an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway, which culminates in the activation of SARM1 in mammals to execute the pathological depletion of the metabolite NAD

Indexed as

DrosophilaNicotinamide MononucleotideAnimalsArmadillo Domain ProteinsAxonsCytoskeletal ProteinsMammalsMiceNADNeuronsArmadillo Domain ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsNADNicotinamide MononucleotideSARM1 protein, mouseaxon degenerationcell biologyD. melanogastergeneticsNAD metabolismneurodegenerationneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36476387
PMCPMC9788811
OpenAlexW4310958815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.