ArticleBMC medical imaging2022
Convolutional neural network -based phantom image scoring for mammography quality control.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Advanced pathological subtype classification of thyroid cancer using efficientNetB0.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Article
- Bioinformatics-based and multiscale convolutional neural network screening of herbal medicines for improving the prognosis of liver cancer: a novel approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVisual evaluation of phantom images is an important, but time-consuming part of mammography quality control (QC). Consistent scoring of phantom images over the device's lifetime is highly desirable. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been applied to a wide range of image classification problems, performing with a high accuracy. The purpose of this study was to automate mammography QC phantom scoring task by training CNN models to mimic a human reviewer.
methodsEight CNN variations consisting of three to ten convolutional layers were trained for detecting targets (fibres, microcalcifications and masses) in American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom images and the results were compared with human scoring. Regular and artificially degraded/improved QC phantom images from eight mammography devices were visually evaluated by one reviewer. These images were used in training the CNN models. A separate test set consisted of daily QC images from the eight devices and separately acquired images with varying dose levels. These were scored by four reviewers and considered the ground truth for CNN performance testing.
resultsAlthough hyper-parameter search space was limited, an optimal network depth after which additional layers resulted in decreased accuracy was identified. The highest scoring accuracy (95%) was achieved with the CNN consisting of six convolutional layers. The highest deviation between the CNN and the reviewers was found at lowest dose levels. No significant difference emerged between the visual reviews and CNN results except in case of smallest masses.
conclusionA CNN-based automatic mammography QC phantom scoring system can score phantom images in a good agreement with human reviewers, and can therefore be of benefit in mammography QC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.