Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476319›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2022

Convolutional neural network -based phantom image scoring for mammography quality control.

Veli-Matti Sundell, Teemu Mäkelä, Anne-Mari Vitikainen, Touko Kaasalainen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veli-Matti SundellDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. veli-matti.sundell@helsinki.fi.
Teemu MäkeläDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne-Mari VitikainenHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Touko KaasalainenHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri Y780019033Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri Y780020049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual evaluation of phantom images is an important, but time-consuming part of mammography quality control (QC). Consistent scoring of phantom images over the device's lifetime is highly desirable. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been applied to a wide range of image classification problems, performing with a high accuracy. The purpose of this study was to automate mammography QC phantom scoring task by training CNN models to mimic a human reviewer.

methodsEight CNN variations consisting of three to ten convolutional layers were trained for detecting targets (fibres, microcalcifications and masses) in American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom images and the results were compared with human scoring. Regular and artificially degraded/improved QC phantom images from eight mammography devices were visually evaluated by one reviewer. These images were used in training the CNN models. A separate test set consisted of daily QC images from the eight devices and separately acquired images with varying dose levels. These were scored by four reviewers and considered the ground truth for CNN performance testing.

resultsAlthough hyper-parameter search space was limited, an optimal network depth after which additional layers resulted in decreased accuracy was identified. The highest scoring accuracy (95%) was achieved with the CNN consisting of six convolutional layers. The highest deviation between the CNN and the reviewers was found at lowest dose levels. No significant difference emerged between the visual reviews and CNN results except in case of smallest masses.

conclusionA CNN-based automatic mammography QC phantom scoring system can score phantom images in a good agreement with human reviewers, and can therefore be of benefit in mammography QC.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerHumansQuality ControlConvolutional neural networkMammographyQuality control

Identifiers

PMID36476319
PMCPMC9727908
OpenAlexW4311677448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.