Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36476009›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Distance estimation in the goldfish (

Adelaide Sibeaux, Cecilia Karlsson, Cait Newport, Theresa Burt de Perera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The visual challenges of short-range navigation in teleost fish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Do goldfish like to be informed?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Distance estimation in the goldfish (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adelaide SibeauxDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Zoology Research and Administration Building, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3340-3741
Cecilia KarlssonDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Zoology Research and Administration Building, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8986-8444
Cait NewportDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Zoology Research and Administration Building, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-7296
Theresa Burt de PereraDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Zoology Research and Administration Building, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8236-8962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurophysiological advances have given us exciting insights into the systems responsible for spatial mapping in mammals. However, we are still lacking information on the evolution of these systems and whether the underlying mechanisms identified are universal across phyla, or specific to the species studied. Here we address these questions by exploring whether a species that is evolutionarily distant from mammals can perform a task central to mammalian spatial mapping-distance estimation. We developed a behavioural paradigm allowing us to test whether goldfish (

Indexed as

GoldfishSwimmingAnimalsMammalsdistance estimationnavigationoptic flowteleostvision

Identifiers

PMID36476009
PMCPMC9554733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.