Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475944›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Microtubule nucleation complex behavior is critical for cortical array homogeneity

Bas Jacobs, René Schneider, Jaap Molenaar, Laura Filion, Eva E Deinum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cell wall dynamics: novel tools and research questions.Journal of experimental botany · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bas JacobsMathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris), Plant Science Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3560-8086
René SchneiderInstitute of Biochemistry and Biology, Plant Physiology Department, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-9742
Jaap MolenaarMathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris), Plant Science Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6011-7487
Laura FilionSoft Condensed Matter group, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, 3584 CC Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9432-9680
Eva E DeinumMathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris), Plant Science Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-200X
University of Potsdam · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant cell walls are versatile materials that can adopt a wide range of mechanical properties through controlled deposition of cellulose fibrils. Wall integrity requires a sufficiently homogeneous fibril distribution to cope effectively with wall stresses. Additionally, specific conditions, such as the negative pressure in water transporting xylem vessels, may require more complex wall patterns, e.g., bands in protoxylem. The orientation and patterning of cellulose fibrils are guided by dynamic cortical microtubules. New microtubules are predominantly nucleated from parent microtubules causing positive feedback on local microtubule density with the potential to yield highly inhomogeneous patterns. Inhomogeneity indeed appears in all current cortical array simulations that include microtubule-based nucleation, suggesting that plant cells must possess an as-yet unknown balancing mechanism to prevent it. Here, in a combined simulation and experimental approach, we show that a limited local recruitment of nucleation complexes to microtubules can counter the positive feedback, whereas local tubulin depletion cannot. We observe that nucleation complexes preferentially appear at the plasma membrane near microtubules. By incorporating our experimental findings in stochastic simulations, we find that the spatial behavior of nucleation complexes delicately balances the positive feedback, such that differences in local microtubule dynamics-as in developing protoxylem-can quickly turn a homogeneous array into a banded one. Our results provide insight into how the plant cytoskeleton has evolved to meet diverse mechanical requirements and greatly increase the predictive power of computational cell biology studies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMicrotubuleshomogeneitynucleationplant cortical microtubulesstable coexistencestochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID36475944
PMCPMC9897462
OpenAlexW4311576128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.