Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475926›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2023

Testing for Phylogenetic Signal in Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.

Jiří C Moravec, Robert Lanfear, David L Spector, Sarah D Diermeier, Alex Gavryushkin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiří C MoravecDepartment of Computer Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3651-1924
Robert LanfearDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
David L SpectorCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, New York, USA.
Sarah D DiermeierDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Alex GavryushkinSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-8249
University of Canterbury · NZAustralian National University · AUCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
VIRAL TRANSACTIVATIONP01CA013106 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI Christopher Vakoc · 1985 to 2026
$116.8M
Assessing the role of lncRNAs in the progression of metastatic diseaseK99CA215362 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI DIERMEIER, SARAH D · 2017 to 2017
$65k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA215362NCI NIH HHS P01 CA013106NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic methods are emerging as a useful tool to understand cancer evolutionary dynamics, including tumor structure, heterogeneity, and progression. Most currently used approaches utilize either bulk whole genome sequencing or single-cell DNA sequencing and are based on calling copy number alterations and single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is commonly applied to explore differential gene expression of cancer cells throughout tumor progression. The method exacerbates the single-cell sequencing problem of low yield per cell with uneven expression levels. This accounts for low and uneven sequencing coverage and makes SNV detection and phylogenetic analysis challenging. In this article, we demonstrate for the first time that scRNA-seq data contain sufficient evolutionary signal and can also be utilized in phylogenetic analyses. We explore and compare results of such analyses based on both expression levels and SNVs called from scRNA-seq data. Both techniques are shown to be useful for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships between cells, reflecting the clonal composition of a tumor. Both standardized expression values and SNVs appear to be equally capable of reconstructing a similar pattern of phylogenetic relationship. This pattern is stable even when phylogenetic uncertainty is taken in account. Our results open up a new direction of somatic phylogenetics based on scRNA-seq data. Further research is required to refine and improve these approaches to capture the full picture of somatic evolutionary dynamics in cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansPhylogenySequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysiscancerphylogeneticsRNA-seqsingle cell

Identifiers

PMID36475926
PMCPMC10125402
OpenAlexW4310948020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.