Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475896›Full record

ArticlemSystems2023

Effects of Variation in Urine Sample Storage Conditions on 16S Urogenital Microbiome Analyses.

Tanya Kumar, MacKenzie Bryant, Kalen Cantrell, Se Jin Song, Daniel McDonald, Helena M Tubb, Sawyer Farmer, Emily S Lukacz, Linda Brubaker, Rob Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tanya Kumar *Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
MacKenzie Bryant *Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Kalen Cantrell *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Se Jin SongCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Daniel McDonaldDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Helena M TubbDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Sawyer FarmerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Emily S LukaczDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Linda BrubakerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8598-2589
Rob KnightDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007198 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHI, NEIL C, INSEL, PAUL A · 1985 to 2024
$29.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replicability is a well-established challenge in microbiome research with a variety of contributing factors at all stages, from sample collection to code execution. Here, we focus on voided urine sample storage conditions for urogenital microbiome analysis. Using urine samples collected from 10 adult females, we investigated the microbiome preservation efficacy of AssayAssure Genelock (Genelock), compared with no preservative, under different temperature conditions. We varied temperature over 48 h in order to examine the impact of conditions samples may experience with home voided urine collection and shipping to a central biorepository. The following common lab and shipping conditions were investigated: -20°C, ambient temperature, 4°C, freeze-thaw cycle, and heat cycle. At 48 h, all samples were stored at -80°C until processing. After generating 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data using the highly sensitive KatharoSeq protocol, we observed individual variation in both alpha and beta diversity metrics below interhuman differences, corroborating reports of individual microbiome variability in other specimen types. While there was no significant difference in beta diversity when comparing Genelock versus no preservative, we did observe a higher concordance with Genelock samples shipped at colder temperatures (-20°C and 4°C) when compared with the samples shipped at -20°C without preservative. Our results indicate that Genelock does not introduce a significant amount of microbial bias when used on a range of temperatures and is most effective at colder temperatures.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultFemaleHumansQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUnited StatesUrine Specimen CollectionRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16Smicrobiomesample storageurobiomeurogenital microbiome

Identifiers

PMID36475896
PMCPMC9948722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.