Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475858›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2023

Radiomic-based machine learning model for the accurate prediction of prostate cancer risk stratification.

Xin Shu, Yunfan Liu, Xiaofeng Qiao, Guangyong Ai, Li Liu, Jun Liao, Zhengqiao Deng, Xiaojing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xin ShuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yunfan LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaofeng QiaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Guangyong AiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li LiuCollege of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jun LiaoCollege of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Zhengqiao DengCollege of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaojing HeDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo precisely predict prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification, we constructed a machine learning (ML) model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features.

methodsBetween August 2016 and May 2021, patients with histologically proven PCa who underwent pre-operative MRI and prostate-specific antigen screening were included. The patients were grouped into different risk categories as defined by the European Association of Urology-European Association of Nuclear Medicine-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-European Society of Urogenital Radiology-International Society of Geriatric Oncology guidelines. Using Artificial Intelligence Kit software, PCa regions of interest were delineated and radiomic features were extracted. Subsequently, predictable models were built by utilising five traditional ML approaches: support vector machine, logistic regression, gradient boosting decision tree, k-nearest neighbour and random forest (RF) classifiers. The classification capacity of the developed models was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.

resultsA total of 213 patients were enrolled, including 16 low-risk, 65 intermediate-risk, and 132 high-risk PCa patients. The risk stratification of PCa could be revealed by MRI radiomic features, and second-order features accounted for most of the selected features. Among the five established ML models, the RF model showed the best overall predictive performance (AUC = 0.87). After further analysis of the subgroups based on the RF model, the prediction of the high-risk group was the best (AUC = 0.89).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that the MR radiomics-based ML method could be a promising tool for predicting PCa risk stratification precisely. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The ML models have valuable prospect for accurate PCa risk assessment, which might contribute to customize treatment and surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID36475858
PMCPMC9975368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.