Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475805›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Shifts in food webs and niche stability shaped survivorship and extinction at the end-Cretaceous.

Jorge García-Girón, Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza, Janne Alahuhta, David G DeMar, Jani Heino, Philip D Mannion, Thomas E Williamson, Gregory P Wilson Mantilla, Stephen L Brusatte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jorge García-GirónGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0512-3088
Alfio Alessandro ChiarenzaDepartamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Grupo de Ecología Animal, Centro de Investigacion Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-6730
Janne AlahuhtaGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5514-9361
David G DeMarDepartment of Biology, University of Washington and the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5426-0471
Jani HeinoGeography Research Unit, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-6613
Philip D MannionDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-6941
Thomas E WilliamsonNew Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, NM 87104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2856-9632
Gregory P Wilson MantillaDepartment of Biology, University of Washington and the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-5473
Stephen L BrusatteSchool of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, James Hutton Road, EH9 3FE Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7525-7319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been debated why groups such as non-avian dinosaurs became extinct whereas mammals and other lineages survived the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction 66 million years ago. We used Markov networks, ecological niche partitioning, and Earth System models to reconstruct North American food webs and simulate ecospace occupancy before and after the extinction event. We find a shift in latest Cretaceous dinosaur faunas, as medium-sized species counterbalanced a loss of megaherbivores, but dinosaur niches were otherwise stable and static, potentially contributing to their demise. Smaller vertebrates, including mammals, followed a consistent trajectory of increasing trophic impact and relaxation of niche limits beginning in the latest Cretaceous and continuing after the mass extinction. Mammals did not simply proliferate after the extinction event; rather, their earlier ecological diversification might have helped them survive.

Identifiers

PMID36475805
PMCPMC9728968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.