Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475608›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022

An Untargeted Metabolomics Workflow that Scales to Thousands of Samples for Population-Based Studies.

Ethan Stancliffe, Michaela Schwaiger-Haber, Miriam Sindelar, Matthew J Murphy, Mette Soerensen, Gary J Patti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Causal mediation analysis of the neuroprotection ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ethan StancliffeDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7286-0024
Michaela Schwaiger-HaberDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2715-753X
Miriam SindelarDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Matthew J MurphyDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Mette SoerensenEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5230, Denmark.
Gary J PattiDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3748-6193

Funding

The Long Life Family StudyU19AG063893 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Stacy Andersen, KAARE CHRISTENSEN · 2019 to 2026
$125.4M
Plasma beta-amyloid in long lived families: genetics and risk of ADU01AG023749 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI COSENTINO, STEPHANIE ANN, LEE, JOSEPH HYUNGWOO · 2004 to 2018
$13.0M
Developing Metabolomic Technologies to Advance Environmental Exposure AnalysisR35ES028365 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PATTI, GARY J · 2017 to 2024
$5.9M
A Comprehensive Platform for High-Throughput Profiling of the Human Reference MetabolomeU01CA235482 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PATTI, GARY J · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA235482NIA NIH HHS U01 AG023749NIA NIH HHS U19 AG063893NIEHS NIH HHS R35 ES028365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of precision medicine relies upon collecting data from many individuals at the population level. Although advancing technologies have made such large-scale studies increasingly feasible in some disciplines such as genomics, the standard workflows currently implemented in untargeted metabolomics were developed for small sample numbers and are limited by the processing of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data. Here we present an untargeted metabolomics workflow that is designed to support large-scale projects with thousands of biospecimens. Our strategy is to first evaluate a reference sample created by pooling aliquots of biospecimens from the cohort. The reference sample captures the chemical complexity of the biological matrix in a small number of analytical runs, which can subsequently be processed with conventional software such as XCMS. Although this generates thousands of so-called features, most do not correspond to unique compounds from the samples and can be filtered with established informatics tools. The features remaining represent a comprehensive set of biologically relevant reference chemicals that can then be extracted from the entire cohort's raw data on the basis of

Indexed as

MetabolomicsSoftwareChromatography, LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID36475608
PMCPMC11018270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.