Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475283›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2022

Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of two types of written information for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Ben Darlow, Melanie Brown, Ben Hudson, Gareth Frew, Jane Clark, Loren Vincent, J Haxby Abbott, Andrew M Briggs, Rebecca Grainger, Carlo Marra and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben DarlowDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Melanie BrownDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Ben HudsonDepartment of General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Gareth FrewCanterbury Community Pharmacy Group, New Zealand.
Jane ClarkConsumer Research Partner, Wellington, New Zealand.
Loren VincentHalswell Pharmacy, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Haxby AbbottDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Andrew M BriggsCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Rebecca GraingerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Carlo MarraSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Eileen McKinlayDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
James StanleyBiostatistics Group, Dean's Department, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZCurtin University · AUPharmac · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Test the feasibility of conducting an individually randomised controlled trial recruiting people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in community pharmacies and evaluate the impacts of a novel information booklet. Design: People with knee OA were identified by pharmacy staff using clinical criteria and randomised to receive a novel information booklet (intervention) or the currently available written OA resource (active control). Mixed-methods process evaluation assessed participant recruitment, retention, and experience. Participant-reported outcome measures, assessing OA illness perceptions, OA knowledge, fear of movement, and pain when walking at baseline and 4-weeks, were analysed using linear regression models (adjusted for baseline). Results: Of 72 eligible people, 64 were randomised to intervention (n ​= ​33) or control (n ​= ​31). The randomisation sequence was followed correctly and no protocol deviations identified. Mean recruitment rate was 2.7 participants per pharmacy per week. One-in-five participants had no educational qualifications and one-in-four had not received a knee OA diagnosis prior to the trial. Three meta-themes emerged from pharmacist and participant qualitative analysis: 'pleased to be asked'; 'easy process'; and 'successful process'. Three participants were lost to follow-up. At 4 weeks, intervention arm Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale scores improved (mean difference ​= ​3.6, 95%CI 0.7 to 6.5). Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire scores were similar between groups (mean difference 0.4, 95%CI -3.7 to 4.5). Conclusion: It is feasible to conduct an individually randomised trial in community pharmacy, a potentially effective setting to initiate accessible OA care. A novel information booklet improved OA knowledge, but is unlikely to affect illness perceptions on its own.

Indexed as

Community pharmacistsCommunity pharmacy servicesFeasibility studyKnee osteoarthritisPatient educationRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36475283
PMCPMC9718297
OpenAlexW4220795762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.