Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475264›Full record

ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2022

Effect of the COVID-19 Vaccine on the Menstrual Cycle among Females in Saudi Arabia.

Fadi S I Qashqari, Maryam Dahlawi, Hamza M Assaggaf, Radi Alsafi, Abdulrahim Gari, Abdulrahman Abudawood, Amal Al-Doboke, Seham Alsulami, Rahaf Bukhari, Shaza Adnan Majeed and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fadi S I QashqariDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.
Maryam DahlawiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.
Hamza M AssaggafDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Radi AlsafiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahim GariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AbudawoodDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Rabigh Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Amal Al-DobokeCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.
Seham AlsulamiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.
Rahaf BukhariCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.
Shaza Adnan MajeedMakkah healthcare cluster- Maternity and children hospital.
Elaf Abdullah SalihDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabi.
Mohammad AlfelaliDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hatim MakhdoomApplied Medical Sciences College, Laboratory Technology Department, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunwarah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Naif A JalalDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.
Umm al-Qura University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The number of reports of menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination in the Saudi population is still unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of the COVID-19 vaccine(Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna) on the menstrual cycle among females in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia at Umm Al-Qura University (UQU) from August 2021 to February 2022. Data was collected through a previously validated online questionnaire. Results: A total of 2338 participants who received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine participated in this study; 1606 (68.7%) of them received the second dose in addition to the first. The mean age of the study participants was 35.4±9.5 years. No significant associations were found between the type of COVID-19 vaccine and the impact on the menstrual cycle, either for the first or second dose (P-values > 0.05). A significant association was found only between the first dose vaccination day and the impact on the menstrual cycle in the second question of "After receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, your next period was" (P-value ≤ 0.05). Significant associations were found between the second dose vaccination day and the impact on the menstrual cycle in the first and second questions of "After receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, your next period was", and "After receiving the first dose, your next period was," respectively (P-values ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The study found a potential association between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual cycle irregularities, which could impact females' quality of life.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleQuality of LifeCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccineFemalesMenstrual CycleMenstrual irregularitiesSaudi ArabiaWomen

Identifiers

PMID36475264
PMCPMC9692149
OpenAlexW4311585979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.