ArticleCureus2022
Misdiagnosis of a Massive and Advanced Seminoma as an Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and therapy of recurrent renal metastases after surgery for testicular seminoma: a rare case report and review of the literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Testicular seminoma presenting as an acute strangulated hernia: An intraoperative diagnosis.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misdiagnosing a seminoma as an inguinal hernia is an uncommon medical concern. A 22-year-old male presented with an enlarged, painless lump in the right scrotum above the right testis. He had previously been given a diagnosis of inguinal hernia by a general practitioner in a rural area two years ago. Pelvic trauma had never occurred before. Scrotal ultrasonography revealed that his right testis was hypoechoic, asymmetrical, and solidly enlarged. A radical orchiectomy was done to remove the tumor. A histological examination of the mass confirmed the diagnosis of classical seminoma. Six months later, the patient had no complications and was in good condition. General practitioners must be more mindful of this tumor, particularly its presentation, since seminoma tumors might be misdiagnosed as an inguinal hernia. This is necessary to preserve the reproductive organs and achieve good outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.