Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475205›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Conventional Versus New Treatment: Comparing the Effects of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonist With Aducanumab.

Elysia Chin, Ecler Jaqua, Mary Safaeipour, Tyler Ladue

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Commentaries: Lecanemab: pioneering the way as the first approved drug for Alzheimer's disease treatment.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elysia ChinFamily Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Ecler JaquaFamily Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Mary SafaeipourSchool of Medicine, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.
Tyler LadueFamily Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA.
Loma Linda University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is the most common major neurocognitive impairment and the fifth leading cause of death in older adults in the United States. The diagnosis is clinical; however, laboratory tests and imaging frequently rule out secondary causes of dementia. Unfortunately, the treatment available for AD does not reverse dementia, but it may help improve the symptoms and slow the progression of the disease. The conventional treatment - acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) therapy and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist - is considered to enhance executive function, overall cognition, and activities of daily living. AChEIs such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine are approved for mild-to-moderate dementia. Furthermore, memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, is authorized for moderate-to-severe dementia. Aducanumab, the newest drug available, is an amyloid-beta (Aβ) monoclonal antibody approved only for mild AD. Treatment with either AChEIs or memantine is more cost-effective than aducanumab and the best supportive care. Aducanumab has particular recommendations with strict monitoring and several adverse effects, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. The most common adverse effects of AChEIs and memantine include gastrointestinal symptoms, dizziness, confusion, and headaches. Therefore, monitoring should be performed periodically at the clinician's discretion for clinical response and tolerability of medication. Conventional therapies are only for symptom management but are still beneficial to patients and caregivers. Unfortunately, at this time, aducanumab's risks outweigh the benefits with a questionable approval process by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, given the potential disease-modifying capabilities of aducanumab, other disease-modifying options may become available by possibly reducing inflammation, preventing Aβ plaques from clumping, or keeping tau proteins from tangling.

Indexed as

aducanumabalzheimer’s dementiacholinesterase inhibitorscognitive impairmentnmda receptor antagonistside effects of medical treatment

Identifiers

PMID36475205
PMCPMC9719396
OpenAlexW4308503348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.