ArticleCureus2022
Optimizing Reliability of Real-Time Sonographic Examination and Scoring of Joint Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMusculoskeletal ultrasound real-time image acquisition and scoring are complex, and many factors affect reliability. Static image reliability does not guarantee real-time scoring. This study aimed to identify factors and solutions to improve real-time scoring reliability for the grey scale and power Doppler evaluation of synovitis. We also report on using a novel musculoskeletal ultrasound synovitis rule-based scoring atlas.
methodsIn four stages, we evaluated inter- and intra-reader reliability among three ultrasonographers (US1-3). Intra- and inter-reader reliability was calculated using weighted-kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Spearman correlation. Reliability statistics were compared between stages using permutation tests to compute empirical distributions for differences in those statistics. At each stage, factors that diminished reliability were identified and addressed. After intensive reliability exercises, a RA MSUS atlas with in-depth scoring rules was generated to improve interpretive reliability.
resultsThe three ultrasonographers had good to excellent intra-reader reliability for real-time acquisition scoring over 2432 views (weighted kappa 0.52-0.80, intraclass correlation coefficient 0.59-0.86, and Spearman correlation 0.64-0.86). Inter-reader reliability was good to excellent between US1/US2 and US1/US3 (weighted kappa 0.51-0.66, intraclass correlation coefficient 0.66-0.75, Spearman correlation 0.59-0.73). US1 achieved significant improvement in intra-reader reliability from stage 1 to stage 2 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.