Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475183›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Communication Challenges While Dealing With a Deaf Patient in the Emergency Department and Suggested Solutions.

Yahia Y Akeely, Abdulhamid Q Alenezi, Norah N Albishr, Badr Ayed Almutairi, Nawaf F Alotaibi, Raghad A Almansour, Mazin A Sabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Experiences of culturally Deaf people with health care access and navigation in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative co-design study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yahia Y AkeelyEmergency Department, Security Forces Hospital Program, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulhamid Q AleneziEmergency Department, Prince Abdulaziz Bin Musaed Hospital, Arar, SAU.
Norah N AlbishrCollege of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Badr Ayed AlmutairiMedical Student, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Nawaf F AlotaibiMedical Student, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Raghad A AlmansourFaculty of Medicine, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mazin A SabiEmergency Department, Prince Mohammad Bin Nasser Hospital, Jizan, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In the emergency department (ED), dealing with deaf patients presents unique difficulties and obstacles. There is insufficient time to arrange for an interpreter. While the voice of the deaf patient was the focus of earlier studies, in this study, we are interested in learning about ED physicians' difficulties and expertise. In addition, we aim to determine which approaches they suggest to address these issues. Methodology A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 166 emergency physicians working in pediatric and adult departments. The data were collected from physicians working in different centers in Riyadh city from January 2022 to March 2022. The data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results In their department policy and procedures, 74.1% of participants claimed no policy or procedure for dealing with deaf patients. The majority of available communication methods were family interpreters (63.9%) and writing on paper (16.9%). Overall, 88% of respondents did not attend any training on dealing with deaf patients, despite the fact that 83.7% thought such training should be available. Furthermore, 90.4% of the participants did not know sign language. Concerning information about the Saudi Association for Hearing Impairment Services, 74.1% were unaware of such services. Concerning modern applications on smartphones, 97.6% were unaware of any existing communication app that could aid in communication with deaf patients. Conclusions In this study, we identified a significant deficiency in the knowledge and skills required to communicate with deaf patients. Hence, we recommend mandating education for physicians and requiring each institution to have an interpreter available 24 hours a day, either in person or via high-quality remote video.

Indexed as

communicationsdeafemergency medicinehearing difficultieshearing impairment

Identifiers

PMID36475183
PMCPMC9719717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.