Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475128›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Blocks (SPIB) With Buprenorphine, Magnesium, and Bupivacaine for Management of Pain in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Sandeep Krishnan, Ronak Desai, Peter Paik, Adam Cassella, Jon Lucaj, Farhad Ghoddoussi, Joffer Hakim, Charles Schwartz, Timothy Leicht, Kinjal Patel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine in Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sandeep KrishnanAnesthesiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Ronak DesaiAnesthesiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.
Peter PaikAnesthesiology, Private Practitioner, Mansfield, USA.
Adam CassellaAnesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, USA.
Jon LucajAnesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Farhad GhoddoussiAnesthesiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Joffer HakimAnesthesiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Charles SchwartzCardiothoracic Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, USA.
Timothy LeichtCardiothoracic Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, USA.
Kinjal PatelAnesthesiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCooper Medical School of Rowan University · USMansfield University · USTrinity Health Oakland Hospital · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Management of post-operative pain after cardiac surgery continues to be a challenge; inadequate management of pain can lead to increased morbidity, impaired physical function with potential delay in recovery, increased perioperative and chronic opioid consumption, increased cost of care, and a decreased quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding buprenorphine and magnesium to bupivacaine for superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks (SPIB) on pain and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Patients undergoing CABG were divided into the following four groups: saline SPIB, SPIB with bupivacaine (BPVC), SPIB with bupivacaine and buprenorphine (BPVC+BPRN), and SPIB with bupivacaine, buprenorphine, and magnesium (BPVC+BPRN+MG). The primary outcomes were pain scores and opioid consumption after SPIB; the secondary outcomes were post-operative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit and hospital. Results One hundred thirty-four eligible patients undergoing CABG were randomized to either the saline (n=27), BPVC (n=20), BPVC+BPRN (n=24), or BPVC+BPRN+MG (n=29) group. All of the intervention groups combined (BPVC, BPVC+BPRN, and BPVC+BPRN+MG) had decreased pain scores and decreased opioid consumption when compared to the saline group; although not statistically significant, visual analog scale (VAS) scores trended downward at most time points with BPVC versus saline, BPVC+BPRN versus BPVC, and BPVC+BPRN+MG versus BPVC+BPRN. There was no difference among the study groups in the incidence of post-operative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV), time to extubation, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS. Conclusion In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we found that SPIB with local anesthetic is effective at reducing VAS scores and opioid consumption after CABG. Further study is needed to determine whether the addition of adjuvants can further improve pain control and opioid consumption.

Indexed as

buprenorphinecoronary artery bypass graftingmagnesiumpost-operative opioid consumptionpost-operative pain managementsuperficial parasternal intercostal block

Identifiers

PMID36475128
PMCPMC9719726
OpenAlexW4307834071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.