Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475109›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2022

Is virtual reality training superior to conventional treatment in improving lower extremity motor function in chronic hemiplegic patients?

Fatıma Yaman, Merve Akdeniz Leblebicier, İsmail Okur, Meltem İmal Kızılkaya, Vural Kavuncu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current Trends in Virtual Exercise Interventions Among People With Disabilities: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Fatıma YamanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6137-0166
Merve Akdeniz LeblebicierDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6147-300X
İsmail OkurDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5019-7185
Meltem İmal KızılkayaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Türkiye.
Vural KavuncuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2619-4977
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to examine the effect of virtual reality (VR) training, frequently included in rehabilitation programs, on lower extremity functional status, mobility, balance, and walking speed in chronic stroke patients. Patients and methods: This randomized, controlled study was conducted with 60 chronic stroke patients (26 males, 34 females; mean age: 64.0 years; range, 33 to 80 years) who presented to the physical therapy and rehabilitation outpatient clinic of the Kütahya Health Sciences University Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital between February 2019 and February 2020. The participants were randomized to the VR group and the control group by simple randomization with 1:1 allocation. The VR group received 30 min of VR training and 30 min of conventional physiotherapy, while the control group received 60 min of conventional physiotherapy. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), 10-m walk test (10MWT), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Results: The FMA-LE, RMI, 10MWT, and BBS scores significantly improved in both groups after treatment (p<0.001). The post-treatment change in the FMA-LE score was significantly higher in the VR group than in the control group (Z=-3.560, p<0.001). Similarly, the change in the BBS score was significantly higher in the VR group (Z=-3.769, p<0.001). Post-treatment changes in the RMI and 10MWT were not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Virtual reality training combined with conventional physiotherapy was found to be superior to conventional physiotherapy alone in improving lower extremity functional status in chronic stroke patients; therefore, adding a VR component to rehabilitation programs will have a favorable impact on treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Chronic strokelower extremitymotor functionrehabilitationvirtual reality.

Identifiers

PMID36475109
PMCPMC9706789
OpenAlexW4310951134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.