Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36475026›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2022

Comparison of the yields and properties of dedifferentiated fat cells and mesenchymal stem cells derived from infrapatellar fat pads.

Shunichi Fujii, Kentaro Endo, Seiya Matsuta, Keiichiro Komori, Ichiro Sekiya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Research progress of infrapatellar fat pad derived mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shunichi FujiiCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro EndoCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Seiya MatsutaCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichiro KomoriCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro SekiyaCenter for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Infrapatellar fat pad (IFP)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have high chondrogenic potential and are attractive cell sources for cartilage regeneration. During ceiling culture to acquire the characteristics of MSCs, mature adipocytes from fat tissue are known to undergo dedifferentiation, generating dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells. The purpose of the present study was to compare the yields and biological properties of IFP-derived MSCs and IFP-derived DFAT cells. Methods: IFPs were harvested from the knees of 8 osteoarthritis (OA) patients. DFAT cells were obtained using a ceiling culture of adipocytes isolated from the floating top layer of IFP digestion. MSCs were obtained by culturing precipitated stromal vascular fraction cells. We compared the P0 cell yields, surface antigen profile, colony formation ability, and multipotency of DFAT cells and MSCs. Results: The P0 cell yields per flask and the estimated total cell yields from 1 g of IFP were much greater for MSCs than for DFAT cells. Both MSCs and DFAT cells were positive for MSC markers. No obvious difference was observed in colony formation ability. In differentiation assays, DFAT cells produced greater amounts of lipid droplets, calcified tissue, and glycosaminoglycan than MSCs did. Adipogenic and chondrogenic gene expressions were upregulated in DFAT cells. Conclusions: IFP-derived DFAT cells showed higher adipogenic and chondrogenic potentials than IFP-derived MSCs, but they had a poor cell yield.

Indexed as

AdipocytesCPC, cetylpyridinium chlorideDedifferentiated fat cellsDFAT, dedifferentiated fat cellsEDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidFBS, fetal bovine serumGAG, glycosaminoglycanIFP, infrapatellar fat padInfrapatellar fat padMesenchymal stem cellsMSCs, mesenchymal stem cellsOA, osteoarthritisOsteoarthritisPBS, phosphate-buffered salineSC, subcutaneous fat tissueSD, standard deviationSVF, stromal vascular fraction

Identifiers

PMID36475026
PMCPMC9712506
OpenAlexW4310358964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.