Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474995›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2021

Knowledge about osteoarthritis: Development of the Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scales and protocol for testing their measurement properties.

Ben Darlow, Haxby Abbott, Kim Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Melanie Brown, Jane Clark, Sarah Dean, Simon French, Rana S Hinman, Chris Krägeloh and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05698368 (A Digital Mindset Intervention to Improve Pain and Exercise Participation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05698368 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Digital Mindset Intervention to Improve Pain and Exercise Participation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Parallel-group Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled458ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsMindset intervention, Active comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Ben DarlowUniversity of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Haxby AbbottUniversity of Otago, New Zealand.
Kim BennellUniversity of Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew M BriggsCurtin University, Australia.
Melanie BrownUniversity of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jane ClarkWellington, New Zealand.
Sarah DeanUniversity of Exeter, UK.
Simon FrenchMacquarie University, Australia.
Rana S HinmanUniversity of Melbourne, Australia.
Chris KrägelohAuckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Ben MetcalfUniversity of Melbourne, Australia.
Daniel O'BrienAuckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
James StanleyUniversity of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jackie L WhittakerUniversity of British Columba, Canada.
University of Otago · NZThe University of Melbourne · AUAuckland University of Technology · NZBritish Academy · GBCurtin University · AUMacquarie University · AUUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: 1) Develop unidimensional instruments to measure osteoarthritis (OA) knowledge among people with hip or knee OA, and 2) assess the structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, test-retest reliability, and measurement error of the Hip Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale (HOAKS) and the Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale (KOAKS). Methods: Draft HOAKS and KOAKS were developed and refined following best-practice (COSMIN) guidelines with involvement of consumer research partners. Measurement properties of the HOAKS and KOAKS will be assessed through an online survey. The survey will include the novel HOAKS or KOAKS, the current short form of the Hip or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12/KOOS-12), and items that gather demographic and OA characteristics and explore self-rated OA knowledge. People will be eligible to participate if aged 18 years and older, can communicate in English, and have either hip or knee OA as diagnosed by a health professional or by meeting diagnostic criteria. We aim to obtain 400 complete HOAKS or KOAKS responses and 100 complete HOAKS or KOAKS retest responses one week after initial completion. Rasch analysis will estimate structural validity, internal consistency and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance. Assessment will include test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) and absolute measurement error (standard error of measurement; smallest detectable change). Conclusion: This study will produce robust unidimensional instruments to measure hip and knee OA knowledge. We anticipate that the HOAKS and KOAKS scales will be useful in clinical and research settings to identify knowledge gaps or evaluate interventions designed to improve knowledge.

Indexed as

Hip osteoarthritisKnee osteoarthritisKnowledgePatient-reported outcome measureProtocolSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36474995
PMCPMC9718068
OpenAlexW3152670816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.