Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474993›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2021

Oxford knee score 1 year after TKR for osteoarthritis with reference to a normative population: What can patients expect?

Y Y W Yap, K L Edwards, H Soutakbar, G S Fernandes, B E Scammell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y Y W YapSchool of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
K L EdwardsSchool of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
H SoutakbarSchool of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
G S FernandesSchool of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
B E ScammellSchool of Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Queen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Total knee replacement (TKR) procedure is commonly carried out in patients with advanced osteoarthritis to reduce pain and increase mobility, with on average 84% rated satisfactory outcome, but some (some suggest 44%) continue to experience debilitating pain. The study aimed to investigate factors affecting pain and function outcomes (using Oxford Knee Score, OKS) one year after TKR, with normative comparison to a reference population. Design: We recruited TKR patients from one hospital (Nottinghamshire, UK); collected pre- and post-operative OKS; graded radiographs for severity of osteoarthritis (K-L grade) in a sub-group. We also collected OKS by postal survey from the local area, calculated age and sex specific normative scores and z-scores of post-operative OKS (Z-OKS). The associations between K-L grade, pre-operative OKS, age, sex, against change in OKS and Z-OKS were analysed. Results: There were 536 TKR cases, 91 in radiographic sub-group and 360 people in reference cohort. Post-operative Z-OKS was associated with K-L grade (β ​= ​0.368; p<0.001). Change in OKS was associated with K-L grade (β ​= ​0.247; p ​= ​0.003); pre-operative OKS (β ​= ​-0.449; p<0.001); age (β ​= ​0.276; p ​= ​0.001); and female sex protective (β ​= ​-0.213; p ​= ​0.008). On average TKR patients returned to 74% of their normative age and sex adjusted OKS, with younger women achieving worst outcomes. More severe radiographic osteoarthritis predicted greater improvement and better post-operative outcome when compared to normative population. Conclusion: This study identified factors and provided normative OKS data intended to guide clinicians in counselling patients regarding likely surgical outcomes. This could help manage patients' expectations, aid decision making and increase post-surgery satisfaction rate.

Indexed as

NormativeOxford knee scorePatient expectationsPatient reported outcome measuresTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID36474993
PMCPMC9718178
OpenAlexW3131911561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.