ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2021
Calcified cartilage revealed in whole joint by X-ray phase contrast imaging.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Micro-CT-based analysis of the murine osteochondral unit: a review and recommendations for standardized subchondral bone assessment.JBMR plus · 2026Review
- In Situ Loading and Time-Resolved Synchrotron-Based Phase Contrast Tomography for the Mechanical Investigation of Connective Knee Tissues: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- New imaging tools for mouse models of osteoarthritis.GeroScience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging (PCI) is an emerging modality that will be in the next few years available in a wider range of preclinical set-ups. In this study, we compare this imaging technique with conventional preclinical modalities in an osteoarthritis mouse model. Method: Phase contrast technique was performed on 6 post-mortem, monoiodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis knees and 6 control knees. The mice knees were then imaged using magnetic resonance imaging and conventional micro computed tomography. Examples of imaging surrogate markers are reported: local distances within the articular space, cartilage surface roughness, calcified cartilage thickness, number, volume and locations of osteophytes. Results: Thanks to PCI, we can show in 3D calcified cartilage without contrast agent by a non-invasive technique. The phase contrast images reveal more details than conventional imaging techniques, especially at smaller scales, with for instance a higher number of micro-calcifications detected (57, 314 and 329 for MRI, conventional micro-CT and phase contrast imaging respectively). Calcified cartilage thickness was measured with a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the control (23.4 ± 17.2 μm) and the osteoarthritis induced animal (46.9 ± 19.0 μm). Conclusions: X-ray phase contrast imaging outperforms the conventional imaging modalities for assessing the different tissue types (soft and hard). This new imaging modality seems to bring new relevant surrogate markers for following-up small animal models even for low-grade osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.