Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474956›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2022

Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.

Sara Domínguez-Salas, Carmen Rodríguez-Domínguez, Ana Isabel Arcos-Romero, Regina Allande-Cussó, Juan Jesús García-Iglesias, Juan Gómez-Salgado

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07649733 (Projecte Benestar 2026), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07649733 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Projecte Benestar 2026: Multicenter Study of the Effectiveness and Implementability of an Immersive Educational Program for Workers in Healthcare Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorBadalona Serveis AssistencialsRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsBurnout, Healthcare Workers, Occupational Stress, Mental Health IssueArmsProjecte Benestar Virtual Reality Educational Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara Domínguez-SalasDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas, Seville, Spain.
Carmen Rodríguez-DomínguezDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-8920
Ana Isabel Arcos-RomeroDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas, Seville, Spain.
Regina Allande-CussóDepartment of Nursing, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-0838
Juan Jesús García-IglesiasDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-0399
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the working, personal and health conditions of health professionals has been highlighted, although it is necessary to verify whether certain instruments used in research on this topic have sufficient psychometric support for their use. This need was the main motivation for undertaking the present study. We aimed to analyse the psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a sample of active health care workers during the pandemic. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2020 with 2326 active health care workers (78.7% women). The instruments that were applied included the UWES-9 scale, the Sense of Coherence scale (SOC-13), the Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and an item on self-perceived health. Results: The three-factor structure related to the correlation of pairs of errors presented the best fit. The reliability of the UWES-9 was highlighted by the adequate internal consistency of the items, the existence of invariance according to gender, and its convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusion: The findings of this work support the use of the UWES-9 to assess the work engagement of health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify it as an adequate measure of this psychological variable and the constructs that comprise it.

Indexed as

COVID-19engagementgender invariancehealth care professionalspsychometricUWES-9

Identifiers

PMID36474956
PMCPMC9719711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.