ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2022
Identifying small molecules for protecting chondrocyte function and matrix integrity after controlled compressive injury.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Articular cartilage injury is central for the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). With few disease-modifying therapies successful at offsetting progressive osteoarthritis (OA), our goal is to use a high throughput screening platform of cartilage injury to identify novel chondroprotective compounds. Targeting articular cartilage damage immediately after injury remains a promising therapeutic strategy to overcome irreversible tissue damage. Method: We constructed a single impact-cartilage screening method using a multi-platen system that simultaneously impacts 48 samples and makes use of engineered cartilage tissue analogs (known as CTAs). Drug libraries were screened and assessed for their ability to alter two crucial biological responses to impact injuries, namely matrix degradation and cell stress. Results: Over 500 small molecules were screened for their ability to alter proteoglycan loss, matrix metalloproteinase activity, and cell stress or death. Fifty-five compounds passed through secondary screening and were from commercial libraries of natural and redox, stem cell related compounds, as well as protease, kinase and phosphatase inhibitors. Through secondary screening, 16 promising candidates exhibited activity on one or more critical function of chondrocytes. While many are mechanistically known compounds, their function in joint diseases is not known. Conclusion: This platform was validated for screening drug activity against a tissue engineered model of PTOA. Multiple compounds identified in this manner have potential application as early protective therapy for treating PTOA, and require further study. We propose this screening platform can identify novel molecules that act on early chondrocyte responses to injury and provide an invaluable tool for therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.