Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474947›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2022

Automatic femoral articular cartilage segmentation using deep learning in three-dimensional ultrasound images of the knee.

Carla du Toit, Nathan Orlando, Sam Papernick, Robert Dima, Igor Gyacskov, Aaron Fenster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla du ToitFaculty of Health Sciences, Collaborative Specialization in Musculoskeletal Health Research, and Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Nathan OrlandoSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Sam PapernickSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Robert DimaFaculty of Health Sciences, Collaborative Specialization in Musculoskeletal Health Research, and Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Igor GyacskovRobarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Aaron FensterSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based approach to automatically segment the femoral articular cartilage (FAC) in 3D ultrasound (US) images of the knee to increase time efficiency and decrease rater variability. Design: Our method involved deep learning predictions on 2DUS slices sampled in the transverse plane to view the cartilage of the femoral trochlea, followed by reconstruction into a 3D surface. A 2D U-Net was modified and trained using a dataset of 200 2DUS images resliced from 20 3DUS images. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using a holdout dataset of 50 2DUS images resliced from 5 3DUS images. Absolute and signed error metrics were computed and FAC segmentation performance was compared between rater 1 and 2 manual segmentations. Results: Our U-Net-based algorithm performed with mean 3D DSC, recall, precision, VPD, MSD, and HD of 73.1 ​± ​3.9%, 74.8 ​± ​6.1%, 72.0 ​± ​6.3%, 10.4 ​± ​6.0%, 0.3 ​± ​0.1 ​mm, and 1.6 ​± ​0.7 ​mm, respectively. Compared to the individual 2D predictions, our algorithm demonstrated a decrease in performance after 3D reconstruction, but these differences were not found to be statistically significant. The percent difference between the manually segmented volumes of the 2 raters was 3.4%, and rater 2 demonstrated the largest VPD with 14.2 ​± ​11.4 ​mm Conclusion: This study investigated the use of a modified U-Net algorithm to automatically segment the FAC in 3DUS knee images of healthy volunteers, demonstrating that this segmentation method would increase the efficiency of anterior femoral cartilage volume estimation and expedite the post-acquisition processing for 3D US images of the knee.

Indexed as

3D ultrasound knee imagingConvolutional neural networksDeep learningFemoral articular cartilage segmentationKnee osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID36474947
PMCPMC9718325
OpenAlexW4283516944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.