Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474938›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2022

Comparative transcriptional profiling of regenerating damaged knee joints in two animal models of the newt Notophthalmus viridescens strengthens the role of candidate genes involved in osteoarthritis.

Matthias Geyer, Christiane Schönfeld, Carina Schreiyäck, Sony A Susanto, Christian Michel, Mario Looso, Thomas Braun, Thilo Borchardt, Elena Neumann, Ulf Müller-Ladner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias GeyerJustus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Christiane SchönfeldJustus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Carina SchreiyäckJustus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Sony A SusantoJustus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Christian MichelMax-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiac Remodelling, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Mario LoosoMax-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiac Remodelling, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Thomas BraunMax-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiac Remodelling, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Thilo BorchardtMax-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiac Remodelling, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Elena NeumannJustus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Ulf Müller-LadnerJustus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
University of Giessen · DEMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare joint regeneration in adult newts ( Methods: Damage of knee cartilage was induced by either intra-articular injection of collagenase or by surgical removal of articular cartilage as a novel additional approach. Changes over time were clinically and histologically analyzed and studied by cDNA microarray analysis, real-time quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry and functional assays to identify relevant candidate genes and determine their impact on regeneration. Results: Several genes were found to be up-regulated during regeneration, including extracellular matrix components and mediators of cell-matrix interactions, genes encoding for cellular components, for cell and tissue homeostasis and tissue remodelling, for cellular processes as well as signalling molecules. A high activity and diversity of transcription was detected on days 10 and 20, especially in the surgical model. 10 candidate genes were further analyzed. The matricellular protein tenascin C (TN-C) attracted our particular attention due to its prominent up-regulation during regeneration in both models and at different time points. Conclusions: Newts are able to regenerate OA-like articular cartilage damage ad integrum both after enzymatic and mechanical injury. Most of the genes involved in amphibians are also known to be operative in humans and other mammals, especially matricellular factors interfering with optimized matrix remodelling. Our results stress the necessity to elucidate mechanistic differences in different species potentially using identical molecules but with different functional results.

Indexed as

CartilageExtracellular matrixOsteoarthritisRegenerationSpecies

Identifiers

PMID36474938
PMCPMC9718156
OpenAlexW4281249397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.