ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020
Framework for modulating ambulatory load in the context of
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Different stress modalities have been used to provoke a load induced mechanoresponse in blood markers of articular cartilages. The challenge in Design: Spatiotemporal parameters, sagittal joint kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) of 24 healthy participants were recorded while walking with reduced (80%), normal (100%) and increased (120%) bodyweight (BW) on three separate test days in a block randomized cross-over design. The reduced and increased load conditions were compared to the normal load condition using paired sample t-tests for spatiotemporal parameters and statistical parametric mapping for vGRF and joint kinematics. Results: Load modification resulted in measured vGRF differences of -19.5%BW (reduced) and +16.8%BW (increased). Spatiotemporal parameters with reduced and increased load did not differ from normal load except of a shorter stance time under reduced load (-21 ms). Joint kinematics for both conditions did not differ from normal load except of decreased ankle dorsiflexion (maximum -5.9°) and increased knee flexion (maximum +6.5°) for the reduced load condition during pre-swing when the support limb is already unloaded. Conclusion: Overall, we did not observe relevant differences in spatiotemporal parameters or joint kinematics between loading conditions. Mean absolute joint angle deviations below 4.1° demonstrate that the proposed load modification framework changes ambulatory load magnitude without changing load frequency or joint kinematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.