ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020
Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sub-pitch plane-wave imaging for improved 3-D ultrasound imaging with a large pitch 2-D array.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Article
- Differences in ankle and knee muscle architecture and plantar pressure distribution among women with knee osteoarthritis.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2024Article
- Deep learning for synovial volume segmentation of the first carpometacarpal joint in osteoarthritis patients.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2024Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal ultrasound: narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Automatic femoral articular cartilage segmentation using deep learning in three-dimensional ultrasound images of the knee.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2022Article
- CT- and MRI-Based 3D Reconstruction of Knee Joint to Assess Cartilage and Bone.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- MRi of the knee compared to specialized radiography for measurements of articular cartilage height in knees with osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a handheld mechanical three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) device for quantifying femoral articular cartilage (FAC) against the current clinical standard of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Design: Bilateral knee images of 25 healthy volunteers were acquired with 3D US and 3.0 T MRI. The trochlear FAC was segmented by two raters who repeated segmentations on five cases during separate sessions. MRI and 3D US segmentations were registered using a semi-automated surface-based registration algorithm, and MRI segmentations were trimmed to match the FAC region from 3D US. Intra- (n = 5) and inter-rater (n = 25) reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated from FAC volumes. Relationships between MRI and 3D US were assessed using Spearman correlation and linear regression (n = 25). Results: MRI intra-rater ICCs were 0.97 (0.79, 1.00) and 0.90 (0.25, 0.99) for each rater with an inter-rater ICC of 0.83 (0.48, 0.94). 3D US intra-rater ICCs were 1.00 (0.98, 1.00) and 0.98 (0.84, 1.00) for each rater with an inter-rater ICC of 0.96 (0.90, 0.98). Spearman correlation and linear regression revealed a strong correlation ρ = 0.884 (0.746, 0.949) and regression R Conclusion: These results suggest 3D US demonstrates excellent intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and strong concurrent validity with MRI when quantifying healthy trochlear FAC volume. 3D US may reduce imaging costs and greatly improve feasibility of quantifying knee cartilage volume during knee arthritis clinical trials and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.