Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474879›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020

Evaluation of treatment outcome using the Patient Specific Functional Scale in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

H E Moore, W L Corning, M van der Esch, L D Roorda, J Dekker, J Groot, M H Wijbenga, W F Lems, M van der Leeden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Using High-Frequency TENS During an Exercise Therapy Program in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H E MooreAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W L CorningAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M van der EschAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L D RoordaAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J DekkerAmsterdam University Medical Centers (VUmc), Dept of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J GrootAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M H WijbengaAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences, European School of Physiotherapy/ Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W F LemsAmsterdam University Medical Centers (VUmc), Dept of Rheumatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M van der LeedenAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reade · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: First, to make an inventory of activity limitations commonly reported by knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Second, to evaluate treatment outcome using the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and compare it to the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function subscale (WOMAC-pf). Design: An observational study with assessments before and immediately after multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Five hundred and thirteen patients used the PSFS, a patient-reported tool to identify activity limitations and score the patient's ability to perform the activity on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), to report three activities in which they were limited. Frequencies and percentages of their highest-prioritized activity were calculated and categorized according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Paired-samples T-tests were used to analyze the change in ability to perform the activities. Effect sizes of PSFS and WOMAC-pf were compared. Results: Most patients indicated limitations in walking, walking up/down stairs, prolonged standing, and standing up from a chair. Following these common activities, 26 different activities were identified. The majority of these highest-prioritized activities fell under the first-level ICF category of Mobility. The ability to perform all activities significantly improved after treatment. Effect sizes ranged between 0.60 and 0.97 and were greater than the effect size of the WOMAC-pf (0.41). Conclusion: Knee OA patients who undergo multidisciplinary rehabilitation exhibit improvements in performing daily activities. The PSFS is a valuable tool to evaluate patient-specific activity limitations and seems to capture improvements in activity limitations beyond the WOMAC-pf.

Indexed as

Activity limitationsKnee osteoarthritisMultidisciplinary rehabilitationPatient-specific functional scale

Identifiers

PMID36474879
PMCPMC9718295
OpenAlexW3019084548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.