Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474876›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020

Developing prediction models for total knee replacement surgery in patients with osteoarthritis: Statistical analysis plan.

Sharmala Thuraisingam, Michelle Dowsey, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Tim Spelman, Peter Choong, Jane Gunn, Patty Chondros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sharmala ThuraisingamDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia.
Michelle DowseyDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia.
Jo-Anne Manski-NankervisDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, 780 Elizabeth Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Tim SpelmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia.
Peter ChoongDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia.
Jane GunnFaculty of Medicine Dentistry & Health Sciences, Level 2, Alan Gilbert Building, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Patty ChondrosDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, 780 Elizabeth Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 12-20% of those with osteoarthritis (OA) in Australia who undergo total knee replacement (TKR) surgery do not report any clinical improvement. There is a need to develop prediction tools for use in general practice that allow early identification of patients likely to undergo TKR and those unlikely to benefit from the surgery. First-line treatment strategies can then be implemented and optimised to delay or prevent the need for TKR. The identification of potential non-responders to TKR may provide the opportunity for new treatment strategies to be developed and help ensure surgery is reserved for those most likely to benefit. This statistical analysis plan (SAP) details the statistical methodology used to develop such prediction tools. Objective: To describe in detail the statistical methods used to develop and validate prediction models for TKR surgery in Australian patients with OA for use in general practice. Methods: This SAP contains a brief justification for the need for prediction models for TKR surgery in general practice. A description of the data sources that will be linked and used to develop the models, and estimated sample sizes is provided. The planned methodologies for candidate predictor selection, model development, measuring model performance and internal model validation are described in detail. Intended table layouts for presentation of model results are provided. Conclusion: Consistent with best practice guidelines, the statistical methodologies outlined in this SAP have been pre-specified prior to data pre-processing and model development.

Indexed as

ABS, Australian Bureau of StatisticsAIHW, Australian Institute of Health and WelfareAOANJRR, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement RegistryATC, Anatomical Therapeutic ChemicalBMI, Body Mass IndexClinical prediction toolsCPT, clinical prediction toolDQA, data quality assessmentElectronic health recordElectronic medical recordEMR, electronic medical recordGeneral practiceGP, General PractitionerKnee replacementKOS-ADLS, Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living SubscaleNDI, National Death IndexNPS, National Prescribing ServiceOA, osteoarthritisOARSI, Osteoarthritis Research Society InternationalOMERACT, Outcome Measures in RheumatologyPrediction modelsPrimary careSAP, statistical analysis planSF-12, 12-Item Short Form SurveySF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health SurveyStatistical analysis planTKR, total knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID36474876
PMCPMC9718256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.