ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2023
Capability of auxetic femoral stems to reduce stress shielding after total hip arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward next-generation hip implants: From failure mechanisms to translational design.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived exosomes for bone tissue regeneration around prostheses.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- A Neural Network-Accelerated Approach for Orthopedic Implant Design and Evaluation Through Strain Shielding Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Functional morphology of trabecular system in human proximal femur: a perspective from P45 sectional plastination and 3D reconstruction finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- The 3D-Printed Customized Femoral Short Stem Offers Improved Anatomical Parameters Restoration, Fitness and Biomechanical Performance Compared With Traditional Femoral Stem.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Disuse After Hip Replacement.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Magnesium as an emerging bioactive material for orthopedic applications: bedside needs lead the way from innovation to clinical translation.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Debulking of the Femoral Stem in a Primary Total Hip Joint Replacement: A Novel Method to Reduce Stress Shielding.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multi-Scale Topology Optimization of Femoral Stem Structure Subject to Stress Shielding Reduce.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 2023 January issue Journal of Orthopaedic Translation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stress shielding (SS) is considered the main mechanical cause of femoral stem loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study introduces an auxetic lattice femoral stem structure with negative Poisson's ratio that can expand laterally, with the intent of transferring more load to surrounding bone and thereby reducing SS. This study aims to evaluate how the geometry profile of different femoral stems with auxetic structures affects the level of SS. Different re-entrant angles for the auxetic unit cells were also evaluated. Methods: This study assessed three commercial femoral stem designs (Mayo, CLS and Fitmore) and three re-entrant angles for the auxetic structures (60°, 70° and 80°). Nine auxetic femoral stems (three M-type, three C-type and three F-type) and three solid femoral stems (control group) were designed. All femoral stems were implanted into a finite element model of the human femur to compare levels of SS between the auxetic stems and their traditional solid counterparts. Results: The results showed that incorporating an auxetic structure into the stem design caused less SS of the surrounding bone than the control models. The M-type stems had the lowest level of SS, followed by the C-type and F-type stems. A re-entrant angle of 70° for the M-type stem, 80° for the C-type stem and 60° for the F-type stem were the designs most capable of reducing SS. Conclusions: This study found that femoral stems with an auxetic lattice structure caused less SS after THA than comparable solid femoral stems. A femoral stem based on the M-type geometry profile is recommended when designing auxetic femoral stems to minimize SS of surrounding bone. The translational potential of this article: The novel solution provided in this study may serve to increase the survival rate of femoral stems by reducing SS after THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.