Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474815›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2021

Program evaluation of GLA:D® Australia: Physiotherapist training outcomes and effectiveness of implementation for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Christian J Barton, Joanne L Kemp, Ewa M Roos, Soren T Skou, Karen Dundules, Marcella F Pazzinatto, Matthew Francis, Natasha A Lannin, Jason A Wallis, Kay M Crossley

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian J BartonDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
Joanne L KempDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
Ewa M RoosDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Soren T SkouDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Karen DundulesDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
Marcella F PazzinattoDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
Matthew FrancisDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jason A WallisDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
Kay M CrossleyDepartment of Physiotherapy Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia.
La Trobe University · AUUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAlfred Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the implementation of Good Life with osteoArthritis from Denmark (GLA:D®) for knee osteoarthritis in Australia using the RE-AIM QuEST (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance Qualitative Evaluation for Systematic Translation) framework. Design: Physiotherapists completed surveys before and after GLA:D® training (2017-2020) to assess practices, and barriers and enablers to implementation. Patients completed online baseline, 3-month (post-treatment) and 12-month patient reported outcomes. Effective implementation was defined as within-participant moderate effect size (ES, ≥0.50) for average pain (100 ​mm VAS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life scores (KOOS-QoL), and small effect size (≥0.20) for health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Results: Conclusion: Training changed practice and was associated with effective widespread implementation of GLA:D® in Australia.

Indexed as

EducationExerciseImplementationOsteoarthritisPhysiotherapyProgram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36474815
PMCPMC9718148
OpenAlexW3133743220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.