Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474813›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2021

Prevalence of small osteophytes on knee MRI in several large clinical and population-based studies of various age groups and OA risk factors.

J L M De Kanter, E H G Oei, D Schiphof, B L Van Meer, M Van Middelkoop, M Reijman, S M A Bierma-Zeinstra, J Runhaar, R A Van der Heijden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J L M De KanterDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E H G OeiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
D SchiphofDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
B L Van MeerDepartment of Orthopedics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M Van MiddelkoopDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M ReijmanDepartment of Orthopedics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
S M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J RunhaarDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
R A Van der HeijdenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Osteophytes, also small ones, are an important imaging feature of OA. However, due to their high prevalence on MR, the question has arisen whether these are truly pathophysiologic features of early OA, a result of physiologic aging, or rather a merely transient phenomenon. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of osteophytes on MR in various locations of the knee, with special emphasis on small osteophytes, across multiple large studies conducted in our institution comprising a wide range of subjects at different ages. Method: Retrospective explorative study of the prevalence of osteophytes, particularly grade 1 according to MOAKS, among four studies with a wide variety in age and OA risk factors. Results: A large number of grade 1 osteophytes were found in all four studies. The largest number of osteophytes were present in the youngest age group of <30 years (69.6%) compared to 36.8% in the age group of ≥30 ​< ​50 years and 54,3% when aged ≥50 years, of which most were grade 1 osteophytes. Conclusion: Small osteophytes are highly prevalent among populations with varying age and OA risk factors, in particular among young subjects without other OA features. This might suggest that these "osteophytes" do not necessarily represent early OA, but rather indicate a transient physiologic phenomenon.

Indexed as

GradingKneeMRIOsteoarthritisOsteophytes

Identifiers

PMID36474813
PMCPMC9718283
OpenAlexW3173011276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.