Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474791›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2022

The role of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) intraarticular injections in restoring articular cartilage of osteoarthritic knees. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Apostolos D Prodromidis, Charalambos P Charalambous, Emma Moran, Ram Venkatesh, Hemant Pandit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07255547 (Arthrosocpic Treatment of Knee Chondral Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07255547 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

Arthrosocpic Treatment of Knee Chondral Lesions: Clinical, MRI and Histologic Comparison Between the Use of PRP vs ADSCs in Addition to Marrow Stimulation Techniques

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità degli Studi dell'AquilaRan2019 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsKnee Chondral LesionArmsBone Marrow Stimulation, stromal vascular fraction (SVF), PRP injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 9. Chronic knee pain.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Apostolos D ProdromidisOrthopaedic Department, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Charalambos P CharalambousOrthopaedic Department, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK.
Emma MoranOrthopaedic Department, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Ram VenkateshOrthopaedic Department, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Hemant PanditOrthopaedic Department, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Chapel Allerton Hospital · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of PRP on knee articular cartilage content (thickness/volume) and examine the correlation between cartilage changes and clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA. Method: A systematic literature search was performed using the Cochrane methodology in four online databases. Studies were included if they reported on cartilage content with cross-sectional imaging pre- and post-injection. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed. Correlation with clinical outcomes was evaluated. Results: 14 studies (n ​= ​1099 patients) from 1452 records met the inclusion criteria: seven RCTs (n ​= ​688), one prospective (n ​= ​50), one retrospective (n ​= ​68), and four case-series (n ​= ​224). The PRP preparation process and treatment protocol varied widely (follow-up 6-12 months). In meta-analysis, PRP treatment was not associated with a significant increase in cartilage thickness (4 studies, n ​= ​187, standardized mean difference: Hedges g: 0.079; 95%CI: 0.358 - 0.516; p ​= ​0.723). Meta-analysis of 3 RCTs (n ​= ​112) showed no significant difference in the change of overall knee cartilage content with PRP injections compared with no PRP (Hedges' g: 0.217; 95%CI: 0.177 - 0.611; P ​= ​0.281). Conclusion: The current literature does not support the PRP as chondrogenic in treatment of knee OA. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the evaluated studies which limits the robustness of any conclusion. An adequately powered RCT, with a standardized PRP regime and standardized high-resolution MRI is needed to definitely define any effect of PRP on knee cartilage content and its relation to clinical outcomes. Until such high-quality evidence becomes available, we recommend that PRP is not administered with the intention of promoting chondrogenesis.

Indexed as

Articular cartilageKnee OAKnee osteoarthritisPlatelet-rich plasmaPRP

Identifiers

PMID36474791
PMCPMC9718182
OpenAlexW4308737999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.