ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2022
Dynamic compression inhibits cytokine-mediated type II collagen degradation.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical activity and joint health: Implications for knee osteoarthritis disease pathophysiology and mechanics.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Evaluating the inhibition of IL-17A and TNFα in a cartilage explant model cultured with Th17-derived cytokines.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2024Article
- Mechanical loading and orthobiologic therapies in the treatment of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA): a comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Mechanical environment forBiomaterials translational · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effect of dynamic compressive loading applied intermittently on bovine cartilage explants stimulated with proinflammatory cytokines over 21 days. Design: Cartilage explants were cultured for 21 days with Oncostatin M and TNFα (O + T) [10/5 ng/mL] or in culture medium alone (w/o). The explants were either left free-swelling or subjected to dynamic compressive loading of 20 min, at 1 Hz, with loads ranging between 0.1 and 1 MPa, 5 times weekly. Metabolic activity was measured once weekly using Alamar Blue and cartilage turnover was assessed with biomarkers targeting degradation fragments of aggrecan (AGNx1) and type II collagen (C2M). Glycosaminoglycan degradation was quantified was the DMMB assay. Furthermore, explant weight and histological analysis was used to assess the cartilage degradation. Results: Dynamic compression of cartilage explants attenuated the O + T-mediated C2M release on day 21 with 40% (p = 0.0068) compared to the unloaded explants. Additionally, the change in explant weight from day -1 to day 21 showed that O + T stimulation alone mediated a cartilage loss of 11%, whereas O + T-stimulated explants subjected to compressive loading demonstrated a decreased cartilage weight loss of 6%, which was supported by the histological analysis. However, loading had no effect on aggrecan degradation. Conclusion: In cartilage explants cultured in a proinflammatory milieu, dynamic compressive loading confers anti-catabolic effects, inhibiting type II collagen degradation and reducing explant cartilage loss. These results demonstrate that compressive loading alters cartilage tissue turnover and enforces the need to include mechanical loading in a translation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.