ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage open
Tracing scientific outputs in the osteoarthritis research field in China based on publications in the Web of Science.
Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global Research on Osteoarthritis During 1994-2023: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications and Citations.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- COVID-19 research progress: Bibliometrics and visualization analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and identify osteoarthritis (OA) study trends in China based on bibliometrics. Methods: In the core database of Web of Science™, we used a common search method and "osteoarthritis" as the keyword to search for articles, and we analyzed the relevant literature published from 2014 to 2018. The included items were indexed according to the countries of publication, document types, organizations, publication years and conference titles. The characteristics of the OA studies conducted in China and the United States (U.S.) were compared according to the following aspects: h-index, average number of citations per item, total number of times cited and number of cited articles. We used Excel 2007 for data analysis. Results: A total of 3603 publications on OA in China, with the number of publications increasing annually, were retrieved from the database. While Chinese institutes were ranked second in the world in terms of the number of OA studies published, the average number of citations per article and h-indexes of the Chinese studies were far below those of the articles from the U.S., as they were 7.51 versus 9.15, respectively, and 45 versus 82, respectively. OA research in China mostly originates from universities. OA researchers in China prefer to publish their studies in specialized journals and conferences. Conclusion: Although large advances in OA research have been developed in China over the past 5 years, a large amount of effort is still required to improve the research quality, influence and novelty in the field of OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.