Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474688›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020

Machine learning in knee osteoarthritis: A review.

C Kokkotis, S Moustakidis, E Papageorgiou, G Giakas, D E Tsaopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C KokkotisInstitute for Bio-Economy & Agri-Technology, Center for Research and Technology Hellas, Volos, Greece.
S MoustakidisElectrical Engineering Dept., University of Applied Sciences of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece.
E PapageorgiouInstitute for Bio-Economy & Agri-Technology, Center for Research and Technology Hellas, Volos, Greece.
G GiakasDepartment of Physical Education & Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece.
D E TsaopoulosInstitute for Bio-Economy & Agri-Technology, Center for Research and Technology Hellas, Volos, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of present review paper is to introduce the reader to key directions of Machine Learning techniques on the diagnosis and predictions of knee osteoarthritis. Design: This survey was based on research articles published between 2006 and 2019. The articles were divided into four categories, namely (i) predictions/regression, (ii) classification, (iii) optimum post-treatment planning techniques and (iv) segmentation. The grouping was based on the application domain of each study. Results: The survey findings are reported outlining the main characteristics of the proposed learning algorithms, the application domains, the data sources investigated and the quality of the results. Conclusions: Knee osteoarthritis is a big data problem in terms of data complexity, heterogeneity and size as it has been commonly considered in the literature. Machine Learning has attracted significant interest from the scientific community to cope with the aforementioned challenges and thus lead to new automated pre- or post-treatment solutions that utilize data from the greatest possible variety of sources.

Indexed as

ClassificationFeature engineeringKnee osteoarthritisMachine learningPredictionSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36474688
PMCPMC9718265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.