ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020
Mesenchymal stem cells and their application to rotator cuff pathology: A meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treating Partial Rotator Cuff Tears: Observational Study with 4-Year Follow-Up.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- The role of injections of mesenchymal stem cells as an augmentation tool in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Satellite myoblast and mesenchymal stem cell injections decrease fatty degeneration after rotator cuff tear in rats.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Biological approaches to the repair and regeneration of the rotator cuff tendon-bone enthesis: a literature review.Biomaterials translational · 2023Review
- Transplant of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Halts Fatty Atrophy of Detached Rotator Cuff Muscle After Tendon Repair: Molecular, Microscopic, and Macroscopic Results From an Ovine Model.The American journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Use of biologics in rotator cuff disorders: Current concept review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff injury (RCI) is a leading cause of morbidity in orthopaedics. Advances in regenerative medicine have led to the novel pleiotropic effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as therapeutic agents for RCI. Objective: Conduct a systematic evaluation of available preclinical studies to quantify the effects of MSCs on RCI. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. At least two independent investigators screened animal studies assessing the therapeutic effects of MSCs on: (i) biomechanical testing, imaging, and/or range-of-motion (primary outcome), and (ii) histologic analyses of wound healing, gene/protein expression of regenerative factors, and safety/long-term outcomes (secondary outcome). Meta-analysis data is reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 858 titles and abstracts were screened; 18 studies (n=576) met inclusion criteria. MSC therapy improved ultimate load failure [SMD -0.43 (95% CI -0.65, -0.22), p<0.0001; 15 studies, 28 comparisons], site stiffness [SMD -0.29 (95% CI -0.55, -0.04), p<0.05; 9 studies, 17 comparisons], bone mineral density [SMD -0.77 (95% CI -1.16, -0.38), p<0.0001; 2 studies, 6 comparisons], and stimulated fibrocartilage formation [SMD of -1.37 (95% CI -1.99, -0.74), p<0.0001; 4 studies, 7 comparisons]. Heterogeneity between studies was high and risk of bias was unclear. Conclusion: Administration of MSCs in preclinical models recapitulating RCI improved aspects of shoulder biomechanics, imaging, and collagen formation. Although these findings are promising, future studies should attempt to limit the risk of bias and focus on optimizing MSCs by standardizing methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.