ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020
Repeatability of quantification of extrusion of the medial meniscus in knee osteoarthritis using three-dimensional models.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Meniscal damage is one of risk factors for the development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) is associated with the progression of cartilage loss in the medial compartment. The objective of this study was to determine the intra-rater repeatability of our method of three-dimensionally analyzing MME in patients with KOA. Design: Eight knees with medial KOA were examined in participants aged between fifty and eighty years old. We created three-dimensional models of the tibia and medial meniscus using a 0.4 Tesla MRI scanner and embedded a local coordinate system into the tibia. Repeatability of measurements of the MME volume and width were tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The ICC for measuring the MME volume was 0.998 [95% confidence interval, 0.992, 1.000]. Measurement error for the MME volume was 0.5-7.0%. The ICC for measuring the MME width was 0.983 [0.924, 0.996]. Measurement error for the MME width was 0.0-11.4%. There was no correlation between the MME volume and width (r = 0.565, p = 0.145). Conclusions: This study concluded that three-dimensional volume and width measurements of the MME by a single rater using MRI images had high repeatability even in the limited image quality. The result of non-significant correlation between the MME width and volume suggests that MME width measured using a low-magnet MRI scanner not considered reliable. Further studies are needed to determine the association between the MME volume and disease progression of KOA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.