ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020
Stakeholder views about a novel consumer health resource for knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Participant experiences of the Knee Care for Arthritis through Pharmacy Service (KneeCAPS): A personalised hīkoi (journey) through care.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Pharmacist-Driven Chondroprotection in Osteoarthritis: A Multifaceted Approach Using Patient Education, Information Visualization, and Lifestyle Integration.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- What does collaborative healthcare for people with musculoskeletal-related conditions look like? A scoping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Online osteoarthritis training programme for community-based clinicians: Mixed methods cohort study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of two types of written information for people with knee osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2022Article
- Exploring changes, and factors associated with changes, in behavioural determinants from a low-cost, scalable education intervention about knee osteoarthritis: An observational cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore consumers', clinicians', and arthritis advocates' perceptions of a novel osteoarthritis (OA) information booklet that challenged existing beliefs, integrated a biopsychosocial perspective, and incorporated consumer voice and experience. Design: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an evaluation survey completed after first reading the booklet and subsequent focus groups with Thematic Analysis. Focus groups were conducted with consumers (people with OA; four groups; n = 19), general practitioners (two groups; n = 11), primary healthcare nurses (two groups; n = 14) and arthritis advocates (two groups; n = 12). Results: Quantitative data identified positive initial impressions of the booklet. Four key themes emerged from the focus groups related to: i) an informative and empowering booklet; ii) the need to be clear about the booklet's purpose and audience; iii) discordance between clinician, advocate, and consumer perspectives; and iv) information and advice conflicting with prior beliefs or experience. Conclusion: A novel information booklet was well received by consumers, clinicians, and arthritis advocates. New information resources can be improved in partnership with consumers and key stakeholders. Co-design with consumers needs to be carefully considered during resource development as consumer views often contrasted with professionals' perceptions of consumer needs. Successful implementation of updated OA information will require a multi-faceted approach that also targets clinicians' knowledge and beliefs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.