Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474583›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020

Stakeholder views about a novel consumer health resource for knee osteoarthritis.

Ben Darlow, Melanie Brown, Rebecca Grainger, Ben Hudson, Andrew M Briggs, J Haxby Abbott, Eileen McKinlay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben DarlowDepartment of Primary Healthcare and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Melanie BrownDepartment of Primary Healthcare and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rebecca GraingerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Ben HudsonDepartment of General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Andrew M BriggsSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia.
J Haxby AbbottCentre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Eileen McKinlayDepartment of Primary Healthcare and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore consumers', clinicians', and arthritis advocates' perceptions of a novel osteoarthritis (OA) information booklet that challenged existing beliefs, integrated a biopsychosocial perspective, and incorporated consumer voice and experience. Design: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an evaluation survey completed after first reading the booklet and subsequent focus groups with Thematic Analysis. Focus groups were conducted with consumers (people with OA; four groups; n = 19), general practitioners (two groups; n = 11), primary healthcare nurses (two groups; n = 14) and arthritis advocates (two groups; n = 12). Results: Quantitative data identified positive initial impressions of the booklet. Four key themes emerged from the focus groups related to: i) an informative and empowering booklet; ii) the need to be clear about the booklet's purpose and audience; iii) discordance between clinician, advocate, and consumer perspectives; and iv) information and advice conflicting with prior beliefs or experience. Conclusion: A novel information booklet was well received by consumers, clinicians, and arthritis advocates. New information resources can be improved in partnership with consumers and key stakeholders. Co-design with consumers needs to be carefully considered during resource development as consumer views often contrasted with professionals' perceptions of consumer needs. Successful implementation of updated OA information will require a multi-faceted approach that also targets clinicians' knowledge and beliefs.

Indexed as

Community participationConsumer advocacyConsumer health informationFamily nurse practitionersFocus groupsGeneral practitionersKnee osteoarthritisPatient education handoutQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36474583
PMCPMC9718132
OpenAlexW3011447133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.