Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474563›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2020

The secretome of skeletal muscle cells: A systematic review.

Antoine Florin, Cécile Lambert, Christelle Sanchez, Jérémie Zappia, Nancy Durieux, Antonio Martins Tieppo, Ali Mobasheri, Yves Henrotin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Does Vitamin B6 Act as an Exercise Mimetic in Skeletal Muscle?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Enhanced Genomic and Transcriptomic Resources forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Antoine FlorinBone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropôle Liège, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM) Liège, University of Liège, Institute of Pathology, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Cécile LambertBone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropôle Liège, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM) Liège, University of Liège, Institute of Pathology, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Christelle SanchezBone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropôle Liège, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM) Liège, University of Liège, Institute of Pathology, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Jérémie ZappiaBone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropôle Liège, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM) Liège, University of Liège, Institute of Pathology, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Nancy DurieuxULiège Library, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Antonio Martins TieppoRehabilitation Medicine Service of the Brotherhood of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ali MobasheriDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Yves HenrotinBone and Cartilage Research Unit, Arthropôle Liège, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM) Liège, University of Liège, Institute of Pathology, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRState Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proteomic studies of the secretome of skeletal muscle cells can help us understand the processes that govern the synthesis, systemic interactions and organization of skeletal muscle and identify proteins that are involved in muscular adaptations to exercise, ageing and degeneration. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize recent mass-spectrometry based proteomics discoveries on the secretome of skeletal muscle cells in response to disease, exercise or metabolic stress. Methods: A literature search was performed in the Medline/Ovid and Scopus electronic bibliographic databases. Only papers reporting the analysis of the secretome by mass spectrometry were included. Results: A total of 19 papers met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. These papers included comparative analysis of differentially expressed proteins between healthy and unhealthy muscle cells and comparison of the secretome of skeletal muscle cells during myogenesis and after insulin stimulation or exercising. The proteins were separated into several categories and their differential secretion was compared. In total, 654 proteins were listed as being present in the secretome of muscle cells. Among them, 30 proteins were differentially regulated by physical exercise, 130 during myogenesis, 114 by dystrophin deficiency, 26 by muscle atrophy, 27 by insulin stimulation and finally 176 proteins secreted by insulin-resistant muscle cells. Conclusions: This systematic review of the secretome of skeletal muscle cell in health and disease provides a comprehensive overview of the most regulated proteins in pathological or physiological conditions. These proteins might be therapeutic targets or biochemical markers of muscle diseases.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMass spectrometryMyokinesProteomicSecretomeSkeletal muscle cells

Identifiers

PMID36474563
PMCPMC9718214
OpenAlexW2948998746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.