Trial reportInternational journal of clinical practice2022
The Use of Blended Teaching in Higher Medical Education during the Pandemic Era.
Trial report in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of problem-based learning combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning in orthopedic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of the effects of different teaching methods on the effectiveness of teaching neurology in China: a bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- The role of digital teaching methods in supporting practical skills training in the academic training of health professions - a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Medical education in Obstetrics and Gynecology: preferences of medical students regarding digital teaching.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Design and practice of blended teaching of internal medicine nursing based on O-AMAS effective teaching model.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Video feedback approach to improve clinical teaching of gastroenterology for nursing students.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Prognostic Clinical Phenotypes of Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- Improving self-directed learning ability of medical students using the blended teaching method: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Acceptance of Smart Technologies in Blended Learning: Perspectives of Chinese Medical Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the effect of blended teaching and traditional teaching in higher medical education during the pandemic era. Methods: Taking the teaching of neurology as an example, 293 Yangzhou University Clinical Medicine 2016 undergraduate students were selected as the research subjects, and were randomly divided into 2 groups a blended teaching group ( Results: There were significant differences in theoretical achievements (81.83 ± 6.23 vs 76.79 ± 6.87, Conclusion: Blended teaching is beneficial to students' learning and stimulates their enthusiasm, cultivates clinical thinking ability, and improves teaching quality. Thus, it has played a positive role in the reform of higher medical teaching during the pandemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.