Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474514›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of pediatric surgery2022

Validation of the Japan Coma Scale for the prediction of mortality in children: analysis of a nationwide trauma database.

Yuki Enomoto, Yusuke Tsutsumi, Asuka Tsuchiya, Takahiro Kido, Koji Ishigami, Masahito Togo, Susumu Yasuda, Yoshiaki Inoue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of pediatric surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuki EnomotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3052-8602
Yusuke TsutsumiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Mito Medical Center, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
Asuka TsuchiyaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahiro KidoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Koji IshigamiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Mito Medical Center, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masahito TogoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Mito Medical Center, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
Susumu YasudaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Mito Medical Center, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yoshiaki InoueDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Japan Coma Scale (JCS) is widely used in clinical practice to evaluate levels of consciousness in Japan. There have been several studies on the usefulness of JCS in adults. However, its usefulness in evaluating children has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the usefulness of the JCS for the prediction of mortality in children. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study which used data from a national trauma registry (Japan Trauma Data Bank). This study included patients under 16 years of age who were treated between 2004 and 2015.The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Two models were used to examine each item of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the JCS. Model A included the discrete levels of each index. In model B, data regarding age, sex, vital signs on arrival to hospital, the Injury Severity Score, and blunt trauma were added to each index. The effectivity of the JCS score was then evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination, a calibration plot, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration. Results: A total of 9045 patients were identified. The AUCs of the GCS and JCS were 0.929 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.904 to 0.954) and 0.930 (95% CI 0.906 to 0.954) in model A and 0.975 (95% CI 0.963 to 0.987) and 0.974 (95% CI 0.963 to 0.985) in model B, respectively. The results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were 0.00 (p=1.00) and 0.00 (p=1.00) in model A and 4.14 (p=0.84) and 8.55 (p=0.38) in model B for the GCS and JCS, respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrated that the JCS is as valid as the GCS for predicting mortality. The findings of this study indicate that the JCS is a useful and relevant tool for pediatric trauma care and future research.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhealth services researchmortality

Identifiers

PMID36474514
PMCPMC9716846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.