ArticleIranian journal of otorhinolaryngology2022
Concordance between TIRADS and Cytology in Thyroid Nodule.
Article in Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Systemic inflammatory indices comprising monocytes provide a clinical significance for thyroid cancer identification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison between Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology with Histopathology in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Palpable thyroid nodules are stated in 4 to 7% of individuals. This study was designed to evaluate the relation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) based cytology reports in patients with thyroid nodules. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, individuals with thyroid nodules who were selected for ultrasonographic-guided FNA enrolled in this study. Demographic data, radiologic assessment, and cytology report were gathered based on hospital medical records. TIRADS grading of the nodules was assessed for each nodule. Cytology was performed on all samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing cytology with ACR-TIRADS and also cytology with TIRADS 4-5 cut-off point as a radiologic malignant lesion. Results: 172 patients were studied, 151 of whom were female and 21 were male. The mean age of the patients was 49.46 years. Most of the patients had TIRADS 4 (53.5%) followed by 3 (31.4%), and 5 (11.6%). 151 patients (87.8%) had a benign lesion in cytology. Of them, 118 had colloid nodules. There was a statistically significant relation between TIRADS and cytology (p-value<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and positive and negative predictive value for ACR-TIRADS classification were 76.19%, 47.54%, 0.619, 20.00%, and 92.06%, respectively. These values for cut-off "4-5" classification was 86.36%, 38.00%, 0.622, 16.96%, and 95.00%. Conclusions: According to the significant concordance between TIRADS and cytology, as shown in the results of our study, it seems that TIRADS could be used to decrease the amount of unnecessary FNA in individuals with thyroid nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.