Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474277›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022

Building capacity in quantitative research and data storytelling to enhance knowledge translation: a training curriculum for peer researchers.

Jason M Lo Hog Tian, James R Watson, Megan Deyman, Billy Tran, Paul Kerber, Kajiko Nanami, Deborah Norris, Kim Samson, Lynne Cioppa, Michael Murphy and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jason M Lo Hog TianMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
James R WatsonMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Megan DeymanMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Billy TranMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paul KerberMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kajiko NanamiMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Deborah NorrisMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kim SamsonMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lynne CioppaMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michael MurphyMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
A McgeeMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Monisola AjiboyeMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lori A ChambersFactor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Catherine WorthingtonSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Sean B RourkeMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada. sean.rourke@utoronto.ca.

Funding

CIHR FRN 165644Public Health Agency of Canada 1718HQ-000778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany community-based HIV research studies incorporate principles of greater involvement and meaningful engagement of people living with HIV (GIPA/MEPA) by training people with HIV as peer researchers. Unfortunately, there are still some aspects of research (e.g., quantitative data analysis and interpretation) where many projects fall short in realizing GIPA/MEPA principles. To address these gaps, we developed an eight-week training course that aimed to build the capacity of peer researchers around the understanding and interpretation of quantitative data and incorporating lived experience to increase the impact of the knowledge transfer and exchange phase of a study.

methodsPeer researchers (n = 8) participated from British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario and lessons learned from the training were implemented throughout the dissemination of research findings from the People Living with HIV Stigma Index study. This paper presents the curriculum and main training components, course evaluation results, and challenges and lessons learned. The manuscript was created in collaboration with and includes the perspectives of both the peer researchers involved in the training, as well the course facilitators.

resultsThroughout the course, peer researchers' self-assessed knowledge and understanding of quantitative research and data storytelling improved and, through interactive activities and practice, they gained the confidence to deliver a full research presentation. This improved their understanding of research findings, which was beneficial for discussing results with community partners and study participants. The peer researchers also agreed that learning about integrating lived experience with quantitative data has helped them to make research findings more relatable and convey key messages in a more meaningful way.

conclusionsOur training curriculum provides a template for research teams to build capacity in areas of research where peer researchers and community members are less often engaged. In doing so, we continue to uphold the principles of GIPA/MEPA and enhance the translation of research knowledge in communities most greatly affected.

Indexed as

Community-based participatory researchCommunity-based researchHIVPatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID36474277
PMCPMC9724271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.