Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474269›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2022

Development and evaluation of a novel dietary bisphenol A (BPA) exposure risk tool.

Jennifer C Hartle, Roy S Zawadzki, Joseph Rigdon, Juleen Lam, Christopher D Gardner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01826591 (Do Insulin Secretion or Genotype Pattern Predict Low Fat vs Low Carb Weight Loss Success?), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01826591 nacompletednot on this map

Do Insulin Secretion or Genotype Pattern Predict Low Fat vs Low Carb Weight Loss Success?

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2013 to 2016Enrolled609ConditionsObesity, Insulin ResistanceArmsLow-Carbohydrate Diet, Low-Fat Diet, Mobile App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer C HartleDepartment of Public Health and Recreation, San José State University, San José, CA, 95192, USA.
Roy S ZawadzkiDepartment of Biostatistics, California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA, 94307, USA.
Joseph RigdonDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Juleen LamUniversity of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA. Juleen.Lam@csueastbay.edu.
Christopher D GardnerStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007034 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2020
$8.7M
Do Genotype Patterns Predict Weight Loss Success for Low Carb vs. Low Fat Diets?R01DK091831 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER D · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS NIH T32HL007034NIDDK NIH HHS NIH 1R01DK091831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals such as bisphenol A (BPA) is primarily from the diet through canned foods. Characterizing dietary exposures can be conducted through biomonitoring and dietary surveys; however, these methods can be time-consuming and challenging to implement.

methodsWe developed a novel dietary exposure risk questionnaire to evaluate BPA exposure and compared these results to 24-hr dietary recall data from participants (n = 404) of the Diet Intervention Examining The Factors Interacting with Treatment Success (DIETFITS) study, a dietary clinical trial, to validate questionnaire responses. High BPA exposure foods were identified from the dietary recalls and used to estimate BPA exposure. Linear regression models estimated the association between exposure to BPA and questionnaire responses. A composite risk score was developed to summarize questionnaire responses.

resultsIn questionnaire data, 65% of participants ate canned food every week. A composite exposure score validated that the dietary exposure risk questionnaire captured increasing BPA exposure. In the linear regression models, utilizing questionnaire responses vs. 24-hr dietary recall data, participants eating canned foods 1-2 times/week (vs. never) consumed 0.78 more servings (p < 0.001) of high BPA exposure foods, and those eating canned foods 3+ times/week (vs. never) consumed 0.89 more servings (p = 0.013) of high BPA exposure foods. Participants eating 3+ packaged items/day (vs. never) consumed 62.65 more total grams of high BPA exposure food (p = 0.036).

conclusionsDietary exposure risk questionnaires may provide an efficient alternative approach to 24-hour dietary recalls to quantify dietary BPA exposure with low participant burden.

trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01826591 on April 8, 2013.

Indexed as

Bisphenol ADietEnvironmental phenolsExposureFood packagingQuestionnaireRisk

Identifiers

PMID36474269
PMCPMC9724381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.