Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474165›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Evaluating cost per remission and cost of serious adverse events of advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis.

Vipul Jairath, Russell D Cohen, Edward V Loftus, Ninfa Candela, Karen Lasch, Bob G Schultz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Vipul JairathWestern University Schulich School of Medicine, London, ON, Canada.
Russell D CohenUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Edward V LoftusMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ninfa CandelaTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., 95 Hayden Ave., Lexington, MA, 02421, USA.
Karen LaschTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., 95 Hayden Ave., Lexington, MA, 02421, USA.
Bob G SchultzTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., 95 Hayden Ave., Lexington, MA, 02421, USA. robert.schultz@takeda.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7023-8378
Takeda (United States) · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the relative cost-effectiveness between advanced therapeutic options for ulcerative colitis (UC) may optimize resource utilization. We evaluated total cost per response, cost per remission, and cost of safety events for patients with moderately-to-severely active UC after 52 weeks of treatment with advanced therapies at standard dosing.

methodsAn analytic model was developed to estimate costs from the US healthcare system perspective associated with achieving efficacy outcomes and managing safety outcomes for advanced therapies approved for the treatment of UC. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) for response and remission, and numbers needed to harm (NNH) for serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) were derived from a network meta-analysis of pivotal trials. NNT for induction and maintenance were combined with drug regimen costs to calculate cost per clinical remission. Cost of managing AEs was calculated using NNH for safety outcomes and published costs of treating respective AEs.

resultsCosts per remission were $205,240, $249,417, $267,463, $365,050, $579,622, $750,200, and $787,998 for tofacitinib 10 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, infliximab, vedolizumab, golimumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, respectively. Incremental costs of SAEs and SIs collectively were $136,390, $90,333, $31,888, $31,061, $20,049, $12,059, and $0 for tofacitinib 5 mg, golimumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib 10 mg, infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab (reference), respectively.

conclusionsTofacitinib was associated with the lowest cost per response and cost per remission, while vedolizumab had the lowest costs related to SAEs and SIs. Balancing efficacy versus safety is important when evaluating the costs associated with treatment of moderate-to-severe UC.

Indexed as

Biological productsCost-effectivenessDrug safetyRemissionUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID36474165
PMCPMC9724317
OpenAlexW4311575712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.