Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474154›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

An unbiased kinship estimation method for genetic data analysis.

Wei Jiang, Xiangyu Zhang, Siting Li, Shuang Song, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detecting inbreeding depression in structured populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei Jiang *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Xiangyu Zhang *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Siting LiDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.
Shuang SongCenter for Statistical Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hongyu ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, USA. hongyu.zhao@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Novel statistical methods and tools to integrate multiple endophenotypes and functional annotation data to study the roles of rare variants in complex human diseases using sequencing dataR01GM134005 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, BAOLIN, ZHAO, HONGYU · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
DMS 1713120NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134005NIH HHS GM134005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimate of relatedness is important for genetic data analyses, such as heritability estimation and association mapping based on data collected from genome-wide association studies. Inaccurate relatedness estimates may lead to biased heritability estimations and spurious associations. Individual-level genotype data are often used to estimate kinship coefficient between individuals. The commonly used sample correlation-based genomic relationship matrix (scGRM) method estimates kinship coefficient by calculating the average sample correlation coefficient among all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), where the observed allele frequencies are used to calculate both the expectations and variances of genotypes. Although this method is widely used, a substantial proportion of estimated kinship coefficients are negative, which are difficult to interpret. In this paper, through mathematical derivation, we show that there indeed exists bias in the estimated kinship coefficient using the scGRM method when the observed allele frequencies are regarded as true frequencies. This leads to negative bias for the average estimate of kinship among all individuals, which explains the estimated negative kinship coefficients. Based on this observation, we propose an unbiased estimation method, UKin, which can reduce kinship estimation bias. We justify our improved method with rigorous mathematical proof. We have conducted simulations as well as two real data analyses to compare UKin with scGRM and three other kinship estimating methods: rGRM, tsGRM, and KING. Our results demonstrate that both bias and root mean square error in kinship coefficient estimation could be reduced by using UKin. We further investigated the performance of UKin, KING, and three GRM-based methods in calculating the SNP-based heritability, and show that UKin can improve estimation accuracy for heritability regardless of the scale of SNP panel.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansGenomic relationship matrixKinship estimationUnbiasedness

Identifiers

PMID36474154
PMCPMC9727941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.